From 1097f5e92107ca3950fabf5e1d724faa80c91e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:06:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [BNX2]: Fix minor bug in bnx2_has_work().
It is more correct to get the status block from the bnx2_napi struct
instead of the bnx2 struct. It happens that they are the same in this
case because we are using the first MSIX vector.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
drivers/net/bnx2.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 44734613ab37..18ed8068dc2d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -2903,8 +2903,7 @@ bnx2_tx_msix(int irq, void *dev_instance)
static inline int
bnx2_has_work(struct bnx2_napi *bnapi)
{
- struct bnx2 *bp = bnapi->bp;
- struct status_block *sblk = bp->status_blk;
+ struct status_block *sblk = bnapi->status_blk;
if ((bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->rx_cons) ||
(bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->hw_tx_cons))
--
GitLab