-
Al Viro authored
don't rely on proc_mounts->m being the first field; container_of() is there for purpose. No need to bother with ->private, while we are at it - the same container_of will do nicely. Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro authoreddon't rely on proc_mounts->m being the first field; container_of() is there for purpose. No need to bother with ->private, while we are at it - the same container_of will do nicely. Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>