-
Lachlan McIlroy authored
bd_super is currently reset to NULL in kill_block_super() so we rely on previous users of the block_device object to initialise this value for the next user. This quirk was exposed on RHEL5 when a third party filesystem did not always use kill_block_super() and therefore bd_super wasn't being reset when a block_device object was recycled within the cache. This may not be a problem upstream but makes sense to be defensive. Signed-off-by:
Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Lachlan McIlroy authoredbd_super is currently reset to NULL in kill_block_super() so we rely on previous users of the block_device object to initialise this value for the next user. This quirk was exposed on RHEL5 when a third party filesystem did not always use kill_block_super() and therefore bd_super wasn't being reset when a block_device object was recycled within the cache. This may not be a problem upstream but makes sense to be defensive. Signed-off-by:
Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>